Menu
Menu
close
The drug crisis in Texas doesn’t look the same everywhere. Some of the highest per-capita numbers come not from sprawling metros but from small cities that rarely make headlines. That’s what makes the list of the worst drug cities in Texas both surprising and sobering. Behind those statistics are families, neighborhoods, and entire communities trying to hold on and rebuild. At Turning Point Recovery Network, we see the human side of those numbers every day. Our work across Texas reminds us that while data highlights the scope, recovery begins one person, one family, one city at a time.
Our programs even include Virtual IOP for those with busy schedules who want to join from their device if they cannot make it to our Dallas or Forth Worth locations offering outpatient treatment for mental health or substance use disorder for things like alcohol, opioids, prescription pills, benzos, and more.
Dallas mirrors Houston in its complexity—big city, diverse population, and equally significant challenges when it comes to substance use. It’s another metro that consistently appears among the worst drug cities in Texas, due to both its crime statistics and the steady rise in overdose deaths. Dallas is also a hub, with interstates and airports making it a natural point of flow for substances moving through the state. The city has invested heavily in treatment and prevention programs, but the size of the problem keeps pressure on the system. Families in Dallas face the same questions as families everywhere: how do you intervene before it’s too late, and how do you hold someone up without losing hope yourself? The city’s diversity means there isn’t a single story of addiction here—it’s woven into every layer of life. What unites them is the need for compassion and real resources.
San Angelo might look like the sort of town where life rolls on without much interruption, but the numbers tell a tougher truth. It holds the highest rate of drug-related offenses per 100,000 people in the state, topping 1,400. That means this community—often pictured as calm and tucked away—has quietly become one of the worst drug cities in Texas. It doesn’t mean the people here are defined by the statistic, but it does show how deeply substance use threads through places far removed from the spotlight. Families are left grappling with questions, trying to figure out whether to handle things privately or lean on programs nearby. For many, the best step forward is to find an IOP, a program that balances structure with flexibility, so that recovery doesn’t feel like exile from everyday life. When towns like San Angelo are recognized in these rankings, it’s not about judgment, it’s about raising the volume on the need for accessible, compassionate help.
Being a major coastal city with one of the state’s busiest ports, Corpus Christi has long been on the radar when it comes to drug trafficking routes. That reality bleeds into the community itself, making it one of the worst drug cities in Texas by various measures of crime and public health. The city struggles with methamphetamine and opioids in particular, and overdose rates have climbed in ways that alarm public health officials. Yet Corpus Christi also embodies the idea of resilience. Grassroots groups, mobile outreach units, and neighborhood organizations are stepping into the gap where formal systems have fallen short. They’re handing out naloxone, running awareness campaigns, and building bridges for people who might otherwise feel written off. In a city defined by the sea, the fight against addiction feels like an ongoing tide, one that requires persistence and community to turn back.
Bedford is a commuter city, a place of cul-de-sacs and quiet neighborhoods. On the surface, it doesn’t carry the same drama as a big metro. Yet in 2020, the rate of drug offenses per capita was nearly as high as San Angelo, landing it firmly on the list of worst drug cities in Texas. That disconnect—the way a seemingly ordinary suburb can hide such intense challenges—reveals the complexity of addiction. People don’t always see the struggle until it’s at their doorstep. Parents talk about kids experimenting too young, while adults share stories of hidden dependence that no one noticed until it tipped over. When a crisis hits, detox becomes the unavoidable topic. Here, outpatient detox is an important option, because it allows someone to step away from harmful cycles without completely pulling them out of their world. Bedford’s numbers remind us that addiction doesn’t live in stereotypes. It can unfold behind well-kept lawns just as easily as anywhere else.
Sharing a county line with Bedford, Hurst comes in right behind it with similarly high offense rates, more than 1,400 per 100,000. That places it third among the worst drug cities in Texas, proving again that the problem isn’t confined to major hubs. In Hurst, you’ll hear stories about families struggling with how to handle a teenager’s first brush with pills, or an adult quietly sliding from use into dependency. The question that haunts so many households is what kind of treatment is right. Do they need the round-the-clock support of inpatient rehab, or is it possible to keep life intact with outpatient care? The debate around inpatient vs. outpatient treatment plays out in living rooms, church groups, and late-night conversations. Each path offers something different, and the challenge in Hurst, as in so many places, is making sure families have enough information to choose the one that fits. Without that, the statistics remain just numbers instead of a call to action.
On the outskirts of Houston, Deer Park records more than 1,300 drug offenses per 100,000 residents, putting it firmly among the worst drug cities in Texas. The community has long been tied to industry, with petrochemical plants dominating the skyline, but hidden beneath the economic engines are families fighting their own quieter battles. In Deer Park, the story isn’t always overdose, but often the steady erosion of stability when drugs take root in households that once felt untouchable. Parents worry about young adults experimenting, while older residents talk about prescription misuse that turned to dependency. It’s a city where neighbors care for each other, which is why building awareness matters so much. This isn’t about scaring people—it’s about showing them what resources exist and reminding them that seeking help doesn’t diminish their worth. Deer Park’s numbers don’t define it, but they do call attention to how addiction weaves into communities just outside Texas’s biggest city.
Lubbock isn’t at the very top of the rankings, but its combination of population density, university life, and rural sprawl nearby makes it a complex case. It lands consistently in discussions about the worst drug cities in Texas because of its volume of drug-related arrests and its share of overdose deaths in West Texas. The student population brings challenges with binge drinking and experimentation, while surrounding rural areas deal with access problems that make treatment harder to find. In Lubbock, people talk about the lack of nearby clinics, the long drives for specialized care, and the burden that places on families already stretched thin. Yet the city also shows signs of resilience. Local organizations step in with education, outreach, and peer support programs. The paradox is that in a place known for its strong sense of identity, addiction can still hollow out lives unless the community confronts it openly.
Texas’s largest city has the numbers you’d expect from a metro its size, but that scale also makes the problem vast. Harris County, where Houston sits, has seen drug-related deaths skyrocket in the past decade, with fentanyl driving much of the increase. That alone puts Houston on any list of worst drug cities in Texas, not because of judgment, but because the statistics demand attention. Here, the stories are raw. Families across every demographic have been affected, and the reach of the crisis doesn’t discriminate between neighborhoods. Houston has responded with a surge of community-based interventions, more access to naloxone, and stronger peer-support networks. But the challenge is constant, because the city’s size magnifies every weakness in the system. For every program that succeeds, there are still households wondering where to turn. Houston represents both the scale of the challenge and the scale of the potential solutions.
Denison sits north near the Oklahoma line, a town defined by its mix of small-city charm and economic challenges. Yet here too, drug violations per capita soar high enough to place it in the top tier of worst drug cities in Texas. The thing about small towns is that addiction carries extra weight. Everyone knows each other, so shame can feel sharper, and that silence can keep people from seeking help until it’s too late. Families whisper about overdoses instead of talking openly, and the stigma feeds itself. That’s why the conversation has to change. Sometimes it starts with one friend, one parent, one sibling learning how to convince someone to go to therapy. It’s not a lecture—it’s showing care in words that don’t sound rehearsed or patronizing. In Denison, as in so many small towns, the barriers to help aren’t just distance or money, but fear of being seen. The numbers prove that silence is the bigger threat.
San Antonio has declared overdoses a public health crisis, and with good reason. Fatal overdoses more than doubled over the past decade, fueled largely by fentanyl and methamphetamine. That lands it on the roster of worst drug cities in Texas, not as an insult but as recognition that the city has faced some of the most visible losses. At the same time, San Antonio is showing progress. Deaths tied specifically to opioids dropped after widespread distribution of naloxone and the introduction of fentanyl test strips. Those are small victories, but they matter. Families here are candid about the damage, yet they’re also quick to highlight how strong community coalitions have become. Faith groups, nonprofits, and local officials are working together in ways that show real promise. San Antonio’s ranking on this list is sobering, but its recent momentum offers something rare—proof that change can happen when awareness meets action.
It’s based on per-capita crime and overdose data, not on stereotypes about the people who live there. The label is a way to identify where need is greatest, not to judge the communities themselves.